How Do Machine Learning Algorithms Improve Accuracy Over Time?

The title and the body of the question seem to be about different topics. Please edit the question to fix this issue.

Alright, pull up a chair. Ten years in, here's what nobody tells you on day one.

That phrase "machine learning improves over time"? Marketing copy. Models don't improve sitting in production; they rot. Real world is data drift, and your beautiful 94% accuracy model is at 78% six months later and nobody noticed until a customer complained. The actual skill isn't training models, it's building the boring retraining pipeline that catches the rot before your boss does.

And here's the part that took me embarrassingly long to figure out: supervised vs unsupervised isn't a debate. It's not "which is better." Supervised answers a question you already have. Unsupervised tells you what questions you should be asking. Different tools, different jobs. Anyone framing them as rivals hasn't shipped anything.

One more, since you're new -- forget TensorFlow for now.

Seriously. Everyone wants to jump to deep learning because it sounds impressive at parties. The truth? Ninety percent of real production ML is a logistic regression or gradient boosted tree in scikit-learn that someone tuned for a weekend. Master those first.

The flashy stuff comes later, and by then you'll know when it's actually worth the complexity.

Last thing. Don't tell the juniors.

Cite your reference, either book or URL. What parts of the cited material do you find less than credible, and want us to expand upon? Does that material describe a real world modeling situation that you found surprising?

You might almost assume that the post was AI-generated...