ROIpad ← Back to Search
github.com › repository issue

self-evolving + cross-Agent sharing style 自我进化与跨 Agent 共享的风格

HKUDS/OpenSpace
Status: Open
Opened: Mar 30, 2026
Hi Team, Thank you for open-sourcing this exciting project! 🙌 Attracted by the self-evolving cat on the top of README.md that grew lobster claws 🦞🐈 That cute and shy cat 😎 has geek AI agent spirit! @chaohuang-ai I had an unsolved issue at ClawWork previously https://github.com/HKUDS/ClawWork/issues/12, seems like a better fit for OpenSpace! 🌟 I’ve tweaked my original questions a bit to match OpenSpace's context here. Looking forward to your report on this! 😺 1. When multiple Agents backed by different LLMs (e.g., Claude, GPT) share evolved Skills through OpenSpace's community, will their Skill libraries gradually converge toward a homogeneous "universal style" ? Or will each Agent's underlying model biases cause it to evolve and apply shared Skills in distinct ways? 当不同底层 LLM 的 Agent(如 Claude、GPT)通过 OpenSpace共享进化后的 Skill 时,各 Agent 的 Skill 库是否会逐渐收敛为同一套"通用风格"?还是说每个 Agent 由于底层模型的偏好差异,即便使用相同的 Skill,仍会在应用和进化路径上产生差异? 2. OpenSpace's evolution engine (AUTO-FIX / DERIVED / CAPTURED) updates Skills based on historical task performance. As Skills accumulate from Phase 1 → Phase 2 and cross-Agent sharing, could opportunistic behaviors arise? for example, an AI agent learning to deliberately trigger execution failures to force Skill regeneration? or systematically over-generalizing high-scoring Skills to unrelated task types to minimize token cost? OpenSpace 的进化引擎(AUTO-FIX / DERIVED / CAPTURED)基于历史任务表现持续更新 Skill。随着 Phase 1→Phase 2 的 Skill 积累以及跨 Agent 共享,是否可能出现涌现式的投机行为?例如 Agent 学...
Python
View on GitHub ↗
Related Content