Comment on: Tailslayer as a CPU-level quantum patch — and why it breaks the case for internet-as-trust-anchor

Kind of a funny (AI?) post I've read... Even IF it were a problem, I believe I have an idea how hardware designers could easily patch it off quite trivially without too much of a performance penalty. Assuming it was so much of a problem that even hardware designers themselves have to step in, 1 idea is they could for instance be having a random rotating seed that's initialized on startup and then each time the cpu has to assign a virtual address or piece of memory some physical block of memory, instead of making it based on some kind of offsets, make the decision which channel data goes to based on the seed. The cpu would internally have a timer to rotate the seed (nextRotation for example could also introduce variable random dynamic jitter and overall be anything between 40 ms and 80 ms into the future), and all this could also be based on how fast the actual processor is so attackers can't easily figure out what the seed is within the window where rotation hasn't occurred yet). The...