Comment on: Show HN: A memory database that forgets, consolidates, and detects contradiction

How can you decide if something is a contradiction without having the context?I'm incredibly interested in this as a product, but I think it makes too many assumptions about how to prune information. Sure, this looks amazing on an extremely simple facts, but most information is not reducible to simple facts."CEO is Alice" and "CEO is Bob" may or may not actually be contradictions and you simply cannot tell without understanding the broader context. How does your system account for that context?Example: Alice and Bob can both be CEO in any of these cases:* The company has two CEOs. Rare and would likely be called "co-CEO"* The company has sub-organizations with CEOs. Matt Garman is the CEO of AWS. Andy Jassy is the CEO of Amazon. Amazon has multiple people named "CEO".* Alice and Bob are CEOs of different companies (perhaps, this is only implicit)* Alice is the current CEO. Bob is the previous CEO. Both statements are temporally true.This is what I run into every time I try to do conflict detection and resolution. Pruning things down to facts doesn't provide sufficient context understand how/why that statement was made?