SaaS Metrics
Regulatory Industry Capture
Nuclear Engineering
AI Synthesis & Market Narrative
The restructuring of federal science advisory panels to favor technology executives over academic researchers signals a shift toward industry-led nuclear and tech policy.
Correlated Linguistic Patterns
["nuclear renaissance"
"science and technology advisory council"
"tech billionaires"]
Curiosity Velocity (60 Days)
WIKIPEDIA API
Tracing the intersection of media narratives and actual public search interest. Dashed line is 7-day SMA.
Driving Media Context
MIT graduate engineering and business programs ranked highly by U.S. News for 2026-27
U.S. News and World Report ranked MIT’s graduate engineering program No. 1 in the country for 2026-27. The MIT Sloan School of Management is ranked as the na...
Working to advance the nuclear renaissance
MIT Assistant Professor Dean Price sees a bright future for nuclear power, and believes AI can help us realize that vision. AI and machine learning methods a...
The Blatant Reasons for the Destruction of NSF (and other federal science agencies)
Trump’s new science panel includes 9 tech billionaires—and just one scientist
There’s a glaring hole in the president’s new science and tech council
Trump’s new science advisers include 12 technology chiefs — and one academic
Sparse academic presence on the US President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology reflects a focus on technology and industry.
Lightbridge to Serve on Industry Advisory Board of $6 Million DOE-Funded Project with Penn State
Study to Advance Nuclear Materials Research and Education Study to Advance Nuclear Materials Research and Education