← Back to Product Feed

GitHub Open Source nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline

Offline multi-agent simulation & prediction engine. English fork of MiroFish with Neo4j + Ollama local stack.

1,184
Traction Score
271
Forks
Mar 14, 2026
Launch Date
View Origin Link

Product Positioning & Context

Offline multi-agent simulation & prediction engine. English fork of MiroFish with Neo4j + Ollama local stack.
ai multi-agent neo4j offline ollama open-source prediction simulation

Related Ecosystem & Alternatives

Discover adjacent products, open-source repositories, and developer tools sharing similar technical architecture.

Deep-Dive FAQs

What is nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline?
nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline is a digital product or tool described as: Offline multi-agent simulation & prediction engine. English fork of MiroFish with Neo4j + Ollama local stack.
Where did nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline originate?
Data for nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline was aggregated directly from the GitHub Open Source community ecosystem, representing raw developer and early-adopter sentiment.
When was nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline publicly launched?
The initial public indexing or launch date for nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline within our tracked developer communities was recorded on March 14, 2026.
How popular is nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline?
nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline has achieved measurable traction, logging over 1,184 traction score and facilitating 271 recorded discussions or engagements.
Which technical categories define nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline?
Based on metadata extraction, nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline is categorized under topics such as: ai, multi-agent, neo4j, offline.
Are there active development issues for nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline?
Yes, we are currently tracking open architectural debates and bug reports for this project on GitHub. There are currently 3 active high-priority issues logged recently.
What are some commercial alternatives to nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline?
Our semantic intelligence engine identifies potential commercial alternatives in the SaaS space, such as Monkey Morse, which offers overlapping value propositions.
How does the creator describe nikmcfly/MiroFish-Offline?
The original author or development team describes the product as follows: "Offline multi-agent simulation & prediction engine. English fork of MiroFish with Neo4j + Ollama local stack."

Active Developer Issues (GitHub)

open qwen3.5的模型支持吗
Logged: Mar 22, 2026
open Simulations List Erase
Logged: Mar 19, 2026
open Stuck in "Configuration generating,Start polling wait..."
Logged: Mar 18, 2026

Community Voice & Feedback

dobrun • Mar 31, 2026
@kmckinley I try to do the same. Can you share more information how you pointed to LM Studio?
kmckinley • Mar 25, 2026
I wasn't able to get 3.5 to work within ollama, so instead I started qwen3.5-35b-a3b in LM Studio and pointed the project to use that. It worked well, though I did have to make a few changes to get it to work.

Increase the max_tokens. qwen3.5-35b-a3b is a thinking model so we needed to give it room for that.
```
def chat_json(
self,
messages: List[Dict[str, str]],
temperature: float = 0.3,
- max_tokens: int = 4096
+ max_tokens: int = 8192
) -> Dict[str, Any]:
```

Remove response_format: LM Studio doesn't support response_format: {"type": "json_object"} — only "json_schema" or "text". The chat_json method passes json_object mode which Ollama accepts but LM Studio rejects.
```
response = self.chat(
messages=messages,
temperature=temperature,
max_tokens=max_tokens,
- response_format={"type": "json_object"}
)
```
h20lee • Mar 23, 2026
> 请问,qwen3.5的模型支持吗?

i would say possible but i have not got the base to work
xXMantequillaXx • Mar 19, 2026
this also is happening to me, i just have some doubts, could it be related to the default ollama service having a really small max token value. Also why qwen2.5 instead of qwen3.5?
Maybe in the yaml file set the context for the compose to launch ollama.
h20lee • Mar 18, 2026
BTW, instruction on frontpage still mentioned Neojs 5.15, and should be updated to 5.18 for the docker run instruction.
h20lee • Mar 18, 2026
Updated with Neo4j to 5.18. Didn't help.



Will investigate more later.
h20lee • Mar 18, 2026
Thanks for looking into this. It did per screenshot, however nothing in it.



Step 2
NAME ID SIZE MODIFIED
nomic-embed-text:latest 0a109f422b47 274 MB 22 minutes ago
glm-4.7-flash:latest d1a8a26252f1 19 GB 3 days ago
gpt-oss:20b 17052f91a42e 13 GB 2 months ago
qwen3:latest 500a1f067a9f 5.2 GB 5 months ago
qwen3:30b 19e422b02313 18 GB 5 months ago
qwen3:8b 500a1f067a9f 5.2 GB 5 months ago
llava:13b 0d0eb4d7f485 8.0 GB 5 months ago
llava:latest 8dd30f6b0cb1 4.7 GB 5 months ago
llava-llama3:latest 44c161b1f465 5.5 GB 5 months ago
llama3.2:latest a80c4f17acd5 2.0 GB 5 months ago
llama3.2-vision:latest 6f2f9757ae97 7.8 GB 5 month...
nikmcfly • Mar 18, 2026
Thanks for the report. The core issue is that your graph appears empty (0 nodes, 0 edges) — the simulation config generator can't proceed without graph data.

A few things to check:
1. Did Step 1 (graph building) complete successfully? Check the graph panel — do you see nodes and edges?
2. Is your Ollama embedding model loaded? Run `ollama list` and confirm you have an embedding model (e.g., `nomic-embed-text`)
3. The `created_at` property warning suggests the Neo4j schema may need updating — try running with Neo4j 5.18 (see PR #10)

Can you share:
- Your `.env` config (redact any API keys)
- Output of `ollama list`
- Whether Step 1 showed a populated graph

This will help narrow down whether it's a graph build failure or a config generation bug.

Discovery Source

GitHub Open Source GitHub Open Source

Aggregated via automated community intelligence tracking.

Tech Stack Dependencies

No direct open-source NPM package mentions detected in the product documentation.

Media Tractions & Mentions

No mainstream media stories specifically mentioning this product name have been intercepted yet.

Deep Research & Science

No direct peer-reviewed scientific literature matched with this product's architecture.