← Back to Product Feed

GitHub Open Source simonlin1212/TradingAgents-astock

A股多Agent投研框架 — 适配A股数据源(龙虎榜/游资/解禁等),7位分析师基于A股规则的辩论决策,基于TradingAgents深度改造,适配大A。A-share multi-agent investment research framework — 7 AI analysts, bull/bear debate, risk assessment。

654
Traction Score
204
Forks
May 13, 2026
Launch Date
View Origin Link

Product Positioning & Context

AI Executive Synthesis
Flexible and granular control over data analysis periods for user-defined insights.
This feature request highlights a critical limitation in the analysis capabilities: the absence of configurable start and end times for data analysis. Users require granular control over the analysis period, such as "monthly analysis," to derive specific insights. The current lack of this functionality restricts the product's analytical flexibility and forces users into predefined or less precise analysis windows. Implementing time-range configuration is a fundamental requirement for any serious financial analysis platform, enabling tailored research and improving the depth of insights. This enhancement is crucial for meeting user expectations for customizable data exploration.
A股多Agent投研框架 — 适配A股数据源(龙虎榜/游资/解禁等),7位分析师基于A股规则的辩论决策,基于TradingAgents深度改造,适配大A。A-share multi-agent investment research framework — 7 AI analysts, bull/bear debate, risk assessment。

Related Ecosystem & Alternatives

Discover adjacent products, open-source repositories, and developer tools sharing similar technical architecture.

Deep-Dive FAQs

What is simonlin1212/TradingAgents-astock?
simonlin1212/TradingAgents-astock is analyzed by our AI as: Flexible and granular control over data analysis periods for user-defined insights.. It focuses on This feature request highlights a critical limitation in the analysis capabilities: the absence of configurable start and end times for data analys...
Where did simonlin1212/TradingAgents-astock originate?
Data for simonlin1212/TradingAgents-astock was aggregated directly from the GitHub Open Source community ecosystem, representing raw developer and early-adopter sentiment.
When was simonlin1212/TradingAgents-astock publicly launched?
The initial public indexing or launch date for simonlin1212/TradingAgents-astock within our tracked developer communities was recorded on May 13, 2026.
How popular is simonlin1212/TradingAgents-astock?
simonlin1212/TradingAgents-astock has achieved measurable traction, logging over 654 traction score and facilitating 204 recorded discussions or engagements.
Are there active development issues for simonlin1212/TradingAgents-astock?
Yes, we are currently tracking open architectural debates and bug reports for this project on GitHub. There are currently 5 active high-priority issues logged recently.
What are some commercial alternatives to simonlin1212/TradingAgents-astock?
Our semantic intelligence engine identifies potential commercial alternatives in the SaaS space, such as Trump Accounts, which offers overlapping value propositions.
How does the creator describe simonlin1212/TradingAgents-astock?
The original author or development team describes the product as follows: "A股多Agent投研框架 — 适配A股数据源(龙虎榜/游资/解禁等),7位分析师基于A股规则的辩论决策,基于TradingAgents深度改造,适配大A。A-share multi-agent investment research framework — 7 AI analysts, bull/b..."

Active Developer Issues (GitHub)

open export PDF
Logged: May 25, 2026
open how setup api_key
Logged: May 25, 2026
open web页面刷新问题
Logged: May 22, 2026
open 生成的pdf是乱码
Logged: May 20, 2026
open 生成最终文件在页面读取的时候报错
Logged: May 19, 2026

Community Voice & Feedback

simonlin1212 • Jun 20, 2026
跟进:「按月分析 / 自定义起始日期」我已经评估过社区 PR #18(它把这功能和字体/主题捆在一起,整体 merge 与现架构有冲突)。我打算**单独干净地重做**——在侧栏加「数据起始日期」并正确传到分析链路,不夹带其它改动。

这个排在下一步,留着这个 issue 跟踪。感谢!
simonlin1212 • May 30, 2026
Glad it's working now! Closing this — feel free to reopen if you hit any other setup issues. 👍
kimiwang26 • May 25, 2026
thanks
simonlin1212 • May 25, 2026
v0.2.7 已修复 markdown 渲染问题(标题、列表、表格、粗体等都会正确排版了)。

关于直接输出 md 文件的建议 — 确实合理,后续版本会加上。目前可以这样临时获取 md 格式结果:

- **CLI 模式:** `python -m cli.main 600519`,终端输出就是格式化好的文本
- **Web UI:** 页面上的分析结果可以直接复制(就是 markdown 格式)

感谢 @Crazy-FuQing @xiaogangqq123 的反馈,标记为 enhancement 跟进 md 导出功能。
simonlin1212 • May 25, 2026
Hi! The error means no LLM API key is configured. Here's how to set it up:

**Step 1:** Create a `.env` file in the project root:

```bash
cp .env.example .env
```

**Step 2:** Edit `.env` and add your API key. You can use any OpenAI-compatible provider:

```env
# OpenAI
OPENAI_API_KEY=sk-your-key-here

# Or use other providers (DeepSeek, Anthropic, etc.)
# See README "配置 LLM" section for details
```

**Step 3:** If using CLI:
```bash
python -m cli.main 600519
```

If using Web UI:
```bash
streamlit run web/app.py
```
The Web UI also has a sidebar where you can input/change API keys directly.

Let me know if you need further help!
xiaogangqq123 • May 24, 2026
> [@simonlin1212](https://github.com/simonlin1212) 作者大大你好 能直接输出md吗 pdf总是会出各种问题 各种报错 我们可以直接生成md 用户想要pdf的自己转一下不就完了
>
>

我也出了同样...
LUCAScoming • May 23, 2026
> Research Manager: structured-output invocation failed (Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'deepseek-reasoner does not support this tool_choice', 'type': 'invalid_request_error', 'param': None, 'code': 'invalid_request_error'}}); retrying once as free text Trader: structured-output invocation failed (Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'deepseek-reasoner does not support this tool_choice', 'type': 'invalid_request_error', 'param': None, 'code': 'invalid_request_error'}}); retrying once as free text Portfolio Manager: structured-output invocation failed (Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'deepseek-reasoner does not support this tool_choice', 'type': 'invalid_request_error', 'param': None, 'code': 'invalid_request_error'}}); retrying once as free text ────────────────────────── Traceback (most recent call last) ─────────────────────────── /home/pyyyc/tradingagents-astock/venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/fpdf/fpdf.py:5681 in normalize_text
>
> ```
> 5678 │ │ # - for ...
LUCAScoming • May 23, 2026
> 我也是同样的问题

这是系统字体的问题,Claude 直接解决就行
pustea-wls • May 23, 2026
我也是同样的问题
Crazy-FuQing • May 21, 2026
@simonlin1212 作者大大你好 能直接输出md吗 pdf总是会出各种问题 各种报错 我们可以直接生成md 用户想要pdf的自己转一下不就完了
pyyyc • May 21, 2026
Research Manager: structured-output invocation failed (Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'deepseek-reasoner does not support this tool_choice', 'type': 'invalid_request_error', 'param': None, 'code': 'invalid_request_error'}}); retrying once as free text
Trader: structured-output invocation failed (Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'deepseek-reasoner does not support this tool_choice', 'type': 'invalid_request_error', 'param': None, 'code': 'invalid_request_error'}}); retrying once as free text
Portfolio Manager: structured-output invocation failed (Error code: 400 - {'error': {'message': 'deepseek-reasoner does not support this tool_choice', 'type': 'invalid_request_error', 'param': None, 'code': 'invalid_request_error'}}); retrying once as free text
────────────────────────── Traceback (most recent call last) ───────────────────────────
/home/pyyyc/tradingagents-astock/venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/fpdf/fpdf.py:5681
in normalize_text

5678 │ │ # - for buil...
pyyyc • May 21, 2026
同样情况,测试了两个环境。一个是windows 10,另一个是windows下的wsl 2 安装ubuntu
simonlin1212 • May 19, 2026
感谢反馈!👍

确认是 bug — PDF 导出时直接把 markdown 原文写进去了,没有渲染格式。

**v0.2.7**(即将推送)中已修复:
- 标题(# ## ###)→ 不同字号加粗显示
- 列表(- 和 1.)→ 带缩进的圆点/编号
- 表格 → 清晰的列对齐
- 粗体/斜体/代码/链接 → 清理为纯文本
- 分隔线(---)→ 横线

升级方式:`git pull && pip install -e .`
hejingchi • May 17, 2026
已提交pullrequest
## 修复内容
3. **数据起始日期选择**:在侧边栏新增"数据起始日期"输入框,默认值为本月第一天,用户可自定义技术分析的数据回溯范围。
hejingchi • May 17, 2026
python -c "from tradingagents.dataflows.a_stock import get_indicators; print(get_indicators('600519', 'rsi', '2026-05-16', 30))"
这个文件的这个函数是处理一个月的技术分析数据的,具体的代码是这里
def get_indicators(
symbol: Annotated[str, "A-stock code"],
indicator: Annotated[
str, "technical indicator (e.g. rsi, macd, close_50_sma)"
],
curr_date: Annotated[str, "Current trading date, YYYY-mm-dd"],
look_back_days: Annotated[int, "how many days to look back"],
) -> str:
应该可以自己改一下默认值处理

Discovery Source

GitHub Open Source GitHub Open Source

Aggregated via automated community intelligence tracking.

Tech Stack Dependencies

No direct open-source NPM package mentions detected in the product documentation.

Media Tractions & Mentions

No mainstream media stories specifically mentioning this product name have been intercepted yet.

Deep Research & Science

No direct peer-reviewed scientific literature matched with this product's architecture.