← Back to Product Feed

GitHub Open Source google-antigravity/antigravity-cli

No tagline provided.

577
Traction Score
28
Forks
May 13, 2026
Launch Date
View Origin Link

Product Positioning & Context

Related Ecosystem & Alternatives

Discover adjacent products, open-source repositories, and developer tools sharing similar technical architecture.

Deep-Dive FAQs

What is google-antigravity/antigravity-cli?
google-antigravity/antigravity-cli is a digital product or tool described as:
Where did google-antigravity/antigravity-cli originate?
Data for google-antigravity/antigravity-cli was aggregated directly from the GitHub Open Source community ecosystem, representing raw developer and early-adopter sentiment.
When was google-antigravity/antigravity-cli publicly launched?
The initial public indexing or launch date for google-antigravity/antigravity-cli within our tracked developer communities was recorded on May 13, 2026.
How popular is google-antigravity/antigravity-cli?
google-antigravity/antigravity-cli has achieved measurable traction, logging over 577 traction score and facilitating 28 recorded discussions or engagements.
Are there active development issues for google-antigravity/antigravity-cli?
Yes, we are currently tracking open architectural debates and bug reports for this project on GitHub. There are currently 5 active high-priority issues logged recently.
Are there open-source alternatives related to google-antigravity/antigravity-cli?
Yes, the GitHub ecosystem contains correlated projects. For example, a repository named googleworkspace/cli shares highly similar architectural descriptions and topics.

Active Developer Issues (GitHub)

open linux_arm64 binary fails on 39-bit ARM64 kernels due to TCMalloc 48-bit VA assumption
Logged: May 20, 2026
open Feature Request: Support pasting images directly into the CLI
Logged: May 20, 2026
open Usage limits compared to Gemini CLI
Logged: May 20, 2026
open BUG: bash: line 237: 344947 Illegal instruction "$BINARY_PATH" install
Logged: May 20, 2026
open Feature request: add ACP (Agent Client Protocol) stdio JSON-RPC mode
Logged: May 20, 2026

Community Voice & Feedback

Radiump123 • May 24, 2026
i barely sent a message and it exhausted my limit...
hakergeniusz • May 24, 2026
Codex has basically the same usage limits as Antigravity CLI but at least it is transparent about it
hakergeniusz • May 24, 2026
So either switch to Codex or use Gemini CLI with AI Studio key
hakergeniusz • May 23, 2026
Update: when I used Gemini 3.5 Flash (Medium), it ate my weekly quota in one relatively simple task
Dawidmx • May 23, 2026
To put the gemini-cli limits into perspective, imagine loading 950k tokens of context files and asking the model a question. You could have done that on nearly a million tokens of context 1000 times!!! 1,000 milions input tokens!
markgerrard • May 22, 2026
+1 for ACP support I currently use Gemini CLI ACP and Codex App Server as part of a human in the loop Claude Code Opus orchestration multi-agent bridge. AGY CLI not supporting it means reverting to a print bridge which will still work for code reviews but seriously limit any longer running jobs by not providing feedback.
Brajesh2022 • May 22, 2026
I'm on Android/Termux and hit the same issue

I got it fully working natively on Termux , no proot-distro, no VM, no Cloud Shell. The fix required addressing 7 separate issues: VA39 TCMalloc patch, `faccessat2` syscall rewrite, glibc `libc.so` shim, `LD_PRELOAD` pollution, DNS resolver, TLS certificates, and shell hash caching.

The `faccessat2` fix is not in @hjotha 's patch, Android seccomp blocks it with `SIGSYS` after the TCMalloc issue is resolved, so both patches are needed together.

Full writeup with reusable patch script: https://gist.github.com/Brajesh2022/e42160d29b55417db6c18c52dd1d6d37

The script is pattern-based, not offset-based, so it should work across versions. You can also paste the gist URL or its full contents directly into any AI agent and ask it to set up your environment , the document has enough detail to follow without human guidance.
Brajesh2022 • May 22, 2026
I'm on Android/Termux and hit the same issue

I got it fully working natively on Termux , no proot-distro, no VM, no Cloud Shell. The fix required addressing 7 separate issues: VA39 TCMalloc patch, `faccessat2` syscall rewrite, glibc `libc.so` shim, `LD_PRELOAD` pollution, DNS resolver, TLS certificates, and shell hash caching.

The `faccessat2` fix is not in @hjotha 's patch, Android seccomp blocks it with `SIGSYS` after the TCMalloc issue is resolved, so both patches are needed together.

Full writeup with reusable patch script: https://gist.github.com/Brajesh2022/e42160d29b55417db6c18c52dd1d6d37

The script is pattern-based, not offset-based, so it should work across versions. You can also paste the gist URL or its full contents directly into any AI agent and ask it to set up your environment , the document has enough detail to follow without human guidance.
doggy8088 • May 22, 2026
On macOS, you must press Ctrl+V to paste an image. I believe it should use Cmd+V instead.
mdfranz • May 22, 2026
Same on my Lenovo 14

```
mdfranz@lenovo-cr14p-arm:~/.local/bin$ ldd agy
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x0000007f90eca000)
libresolv.so.2 => /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libresolv.so.2 (0x0000007f90e50000)
libpthread.so.0 => /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000007f90e20000)
libm.so.6 => /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libm.so.6 (0x0000007f90d70000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x0000007f90d40000)
librt.so.1 => /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/librt.so.1 (0x0000007f90d10000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/aarch64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x0000007f83050000)
/lib/ld-linux-aarch64.so.1 (0x0000007f90e80000)
mdfranz@lenovo-cr14p-arm:~/.local/bin$ ./agy
4344 third_party/tcmalloc/internal/system_allocator.h:595] MmapAligned() failed - unable to allocate with tag (hint=0x2ffcc0000000, size=1073741824, alignment=1073741824) - is something limiting address placement?
4344 third_party/tcmalloc/internal/system_allocator.h:602] Note: the allocation may have ...
jimmyliao • May 21, 2026
+1 from a GDE perspective.

Concrete signal beyond the general ecosystem argument:
- I run a dual-engine workflow (Claude + Gemini) across ~10 machines
via Tailscale, using ACP brokers (OpenAB-style) to bridge them into
Discord/Telegram for mobile/remote use. `gemini --acp` is currently
the Gemini side of this; `agy --acp` would let it survive the 6/18
gemini-cli sunset without code changes on the orchestrator side.
- Re: sbinnee's correction — agreed, `claude --acp` is via
@zed-industries/claude-code-acp not native, and `codex acp` is via
Zed similarly. But the user experience is the same: a single
`--acp` invocation point. Whether agy ships it natively or Google
publishes an `@google/agy-acp` adapter, either resolves the
orchestrator integration gap.
Happy to test a beta if/when there's something to try.
maxperron • May 21, 2026
I'm adding to this thread for visibility. I'm trying to migrate from Gemini CLI to Antigravity CLI. But I got the same error:

```
FATAL ERROR: This binary was compiled with aes enabled, but this feature is not available on this processor (go/sigill-fail-fast).
bash: line 237: 50341 Illegal instruction "$BINARY_PATH" install

```

No AES on my old CPU where I run the CLI: Intel Core i3 3240
lmtr0 • May 21, 2026
+1 for acp support.

Currently I use the acp clients to develop projects in the background, this is crucial for it to work
lesteral • May 21, 2026
I believe this is a duplicate of #8
rgiaviti • May 20, 2026
I'm running into the exact same issue as the user with the i3-3210 above, but on an **Intel Core i5-3210M** (older Samsung laptop) running Ubuntu Server 26.04 LTS.

In my case, the CPU physically supports AES-NI, but the manufacturer permanently locked the feature in the BIOS. As a result, the OS can never see the `aes` flag, making it impossible to bypass on my end.

I get the exact same crash during installation:

```bash
FATAL ERROR: This binary was compiled with aes enabled, but this feature is not available on this processor (go/sigill-fail-fast).
bash: line 237: 2049 Illegal instruction "$BINARY_PATH" install

```

Just wanted to add my use case to highlight that this strict hardware requirement is locking out valid `linux_amd64` machines, not just older ARM boards.

I was running the **Gemini CLI** on this exact same setup without any problems, as it didn't enforce this baseline. It would be great if the team could provide a baseline compatibility build (e.g., compiled w...

Discovery Source

GitHub Open Source GitHub Open Source

Aggregated via automated community intelligence tracking.

Tech Stack Dependencies

No direct open-source NPM package mentions detected in the product documentation.

Media Tractions & Mentions

No mainstream media stories specifically mentioning this product name have been intercepted yet.

Deep Research & Science

No direct peer-reviewed scientific literature matched with this product's architecture.