ClinicFrame

One decision we made early was to build ClinicFrame as a desktop app that works quietly in the background. Clinicians shouldn’t have to manage another interface, constantly check that it’s working, or divide their attention between the patient, the EHR, and yet another tool. The best technology fades into the background so clinicians can stay fully present with their patients—that’s the experience we’re building.

congrats on the launch folks!

Every AI company seems to start with a scribe, but the real opportunity feels much bigger. Once you've captured the clinical conversation, you have the context to improve the entire patient journey. Is that where you see ClinicFrame heading?

Congrats on the launch. Putting the BAA at self-serve pricing is a bigger deal than it sounds - most teams keep that behind a sales call. Something I did not see asked yet: with 8,000 clinicians spread across different practices, in the window after a note is written but before it lands in the EHR, what decides who else in that practice can open it - your own permissions layer, or whatever the EHR hands back?

You mention that clinicians remain the author of every note. Have you seen any patterns in what clinicians edit most often before signing? Does that feedback improve future notes?

Love that this is desktop native and covers in-person visits, not just telehealth calls. Spending three years on compliance infrastructure before shipping the scribe says a lot about the approach. You mentioned insurance billing workflows are next, will that live inside the same app or become a separate product?

Dana here, I work with Clemente on ClinicFrame. Happy to be following the feedback on launch day.A few weeks ago, I asked my physician whether he reviews my lab results as they arrive, or whether a separate appointment is required for that conversation. His response: 'I see 1,500 patients a week. If I reviewed every patient's results personally, I would not sleep. You need to schedule a visit for that.'There is real satisfaction in building something clinicians genuinely need, and holding it to the same standard of data privacy that earned the trust of 8,000 clinicians with CompliantChatGPT. Documentation was never meant to take time away from the patient in the room, nor to become additional work left for the end of the day. That is the piece AI can actually take on, without asking a clinician to trade privacy for speed. That is what safe AI should look like.

The versioned-amendment answer to Maciej and the traceable-evidence answer to Ansari are the two best answers I've seen on this kind of product, most scribes wave away the audit trail question. One thing I didn't see covered: a lot of visits aren't just doctor and patient, there's a caregiver, a family member translating, sometimes an interpreter on speakerphone. Does the note distinguish who actually said the symptom versus who's relaying it secondhand, or does that nuance flatten out in the transcript the same way it would in a rushed human note?

There are plenty of AI scribes out there. We know that! But after talking to hundreds of clinicians, we realized the real challenge isn't just generating notes. It's building something they can actually rely on every single day.We focused on what matters most: reliability, responsive support, and compliance. No dropped sessions. No unexpected downtime. Just a product that works when clinicians need it most.We listened closely to our users and built the product they kept asking for.This launch is much more than an AI scribe for us, it's the first step toward a broader vision of medical intelligence that helps clinicians before, during, and after every patient encounter.Excited to finally share the work of so many months with the world. Thanks everyone for the incredible support here on Product Hunt. We can't wait to keep building with your feedback!

Hey Clemente, this looks really cool, congrats on the launch 🚀You mention that it’s EHR-ready. Are you initially focusing on specific countries and healthcare systems, or is ClinicFrame designed to be international from day one? Healthcare regulations and EHR ecosystems vary so much between countries, so I’m curious how you’re approaching that.Best of luck today!

Signed up to try it. For anyone else evaluating: what the first week actually look like, and how many note it take before you trusted the draft? That is the number i care more than any feature list.

Would be usefull to hear from clinicians who have been on it for a while.

So excited to finally see ClinicFrame out in the world! We’ve spent a lot of time listening to clinicians and understanding the reality of documentation, and it’s been amazing to see that work turn into a product that can genuinely make their day a little easier.If you work in healthcare and have tried ClinicFrame, we’d love to hear what you think. And if you haven’t yet, give it a try and let us know where we can improve. We’re here and listening!

the shadow-IT framing is the strongest part here tbh, you're not selling a new habit, just a compliant version of one clinicians already formed on their own. the thing I'd want to know is edit friction, since the clinician signs the note and carries the liability, so time-to-correct probably matters more than aggregate accuracy.

Not a clinician. I build compliance software, so I'm answering sideways.The one thing I'd never let a tool do: change anything after a human signed it. Silently, in a background job, with no record of what moved.Every AI action in my product needs an explicit confirm and an audit log entry. Because "who changed this and when" deserves a better answer than "the model, sometime Tuesday."A signed clinical note is a legal document. An AI that quietly edits it after the fact hasn't improved it. It's forged it.You've clearly thought about this already. The part I'd stress-test is post-signature: re-runs, template migrations, retro-enhancement of old notes.Congrats on the launch.

Great & Genuine Concept , don't you think there's need of mobile app for Clinic Frame, To personalize experience?