NudgeForMe

Anything the Snoooz team creates you can count on being top quality and probably the best support you've ever received for a product. I've been with them for over a year and @victoria_dash is an absolute super star. These guys are experts with anything email and at the end of the day, email is our biggest relationship management and sales system because it's personal. Wishing you guys so much success with this launch. From a very happy Snoooz user ❤️🚀

Great product. I have already implemented this into my daily use. It found 2 two deals I neglected to follow up on. Just paid for itself in the first week.

Bruh gets access to my mailbox? So I am not only giving away data to them but also their AI providers? Interesting.

How accurate are the followup suggestions and can user customize the type of reminders they want?

Does it look at the conversation context or mainly the time since the last reply?

Congratulations on the launch. This looks very interesting. I'm going to sign up for it soon.

The tone matching is the part everyone's asking about, but I'd worry more about false positives, threads that look unanswered but weren't actually waiting on anything, like a "sounds good, thanks" that just didn't need a reply back. How does it tell that kind of silence apart from someone actually going quiet on you?

So, basically this app will also ready my OTPs and Sensitive Codes in my mail box I guess?

This looks built for warm threads, and what I'd worry about is someone pointing it at a cold list. No reply is the normal case there, so it drafts a nudge for nearly everyone, out of the one mailbox they cannot afford to burn. I keep cold sending on a separate warmed domain for that reason, so does it tell a quiet thread apart from one that was never warm?

the detection quality questions in here are all good ones, but the thing I haven't seen asked yet is what happens to the actual email content once it's scanned. reading sent conversations well enough to tell "thanks, talk soon" apart from a real dropped thread means an LLM is seeing the full text of my client emails and partnership deals, not just headers or timestamps. is that content processed and then discarded, or retained/logged anywhere on your end? for a tool sitting on my entire sent folder that's the question I'd want answered in writing before connecting a real inbox, not just "draft mode by default."

Follow-up is the cheapest revenue sitting in most inboxes and almost nobody does it consistently. Nice to see someone build for that specific gap instead of another inbox rewrite. Draft mode as the default is a smart call too.

Love the idea. One question though—how does NudgeForMe decide which conversations actually need a follow-up versus threads that are intentionally left unanswered? Curious about the intelligence behind thatCongrats on the launch @chitreshsingh

Draft mode before any send is the right call. What I want to know: does it look for actual signals in the sent message, like a question or an explicit request, or is the detection purely time-based? A thread that ended with 'thanks, talk soon' should not queue a nudge. Those are easy to misread as cold.

Draft mode is the right default, and it also makes precision the entire product. If I open the folder and 4 of 15 drafts are worth sending, I stop opening the folder by week two and the 4 good ones die with the rest. I'd trade recall away hard for that, something like only flag threads where I asked a direct question and got silence for five days, because two right nudges a week beats fifteen maybes.

Pretty good idea .. Up until now I only see this in gmail, but with this product it is possible to expand.