VibeDefend by CybeDefend

the 88% to 89% jump is the number I'd want more detail on, not because it's small, but because it implies 11% of cases still slip through even with the agent governed at write-time. what does that residual 11% look like in practice, is it mostly novel command patterns your ruleset hasn't seen yet, or edge cases where the agent works around the guard through a legitimate-looking path (like writing to a file that gets executed later instead of running the command directly)?

Being on the AWS marketplace makes procurement so much easier, smart move 🙃

Mining rules from the repo worries me a bit on older codebases. I audited one last month where four different places decided who counts as an admin, and they disagreed: two lower cased the email, two didn't. "Most consistent convention" there is a two against two tie, and either winner is a bug.Does the miner flag contradictions like that for a human, or pick one? I'd rather get the list of disagreements than the rules.

Hey, what an amazing idea ! Is it easy to integrate to any project ?

What if there is a conflict between the security directive and the instruction from the developer to the agent?Btw, Congratulations Team VibeDefend by CybeDefend ✌️

Hey! Solid launch! I wonder how can I integrate this application into my current setup

great to have new security products in the devtools space. I love that you have dedicated comparison pages for existing tools - really easy to differentiate. kudos on the launch!

Quick update for the community! 📣Seeing all the great discussions today in the comments about the risks of AI coding agents (like data leakage and compliance rules), I thought this would be the perfect place to share an upcoming event we are super excited about.We’re hosting a live webinar with Jason Lee (former CISO at Zoom, Splunk, and F5) entirely dedicated to the security of AI coding agents. We'll be diving deep into how engineering teams can actually scale these autonomous tools safely without giving the security team a heart attack.If today's launch caught your interest and you want to dig deeper into the topic with a top-tier cybersecurity expert, we'd love to have you join the conversation.You can grab your spot right here: https://www.cybedefend.com/en/webinarWould love to see some of you there! Let me know if there are specific questions you'd like us to ask him. 👇

Does the secrets scanner also check files that are generated or modified indirectly by the coding agent?

Can teams define their own blocked commands based on their internal security policies?

Does the agent get the security feedback immediately so it can fix the issue in the same coding session?

How much control do teams have over the business rules mined from the repo?

Hey Product Hunt ! 👋 I’m Axel, the third co-founder, handling Growth and Go-To-Market here at CybeDefend@julien_zammit shared our origin story, and @florentin_ledy highlighted the tech. I want to talk about what happens when you actually put VibeDefend in the hands of a dev team.When we ran our study, we found something crazy: left to their own devices, AI agents ignored internal business and compliance rules in 88% of cases. They write fast, but they accumulate silent technical debt just as quickly.By governing the agent at the exact moment the code is written (an approach we call "Shift-0"), VibeDefend brings that rule compliance up to 89%.It’s not just a security tool; it’s an enabler. It allows your team to confidently scale "vibe-coding" without the CISO or the Lead Dev losing sleep over what’s being shipped to production.I’ll be hanging out in the comments all day with the team. I'd love to know: what is the main risk keeping your team from giving full autonomy to AI coding agents right now? Let's chat!