← Back to Research Radar
Scientific Literature Scientific Literature

RLE-Based Model Predictive Control vs. Rule-Based Control for Energy Management in Multi-Architecture Electric Vehicles

Digvijay B Kanase, Arun Thorat, Pravin Mane, Prateek D. Malwe, Pramod Magade, Choon Kit Chan, Subhav Singh, Deekshant Varshney
August 31, 2026
Published Date

Research Abstract & Technology Focus

Energy management is a key factor in the range, safety and battery life of electrified vehicles. In this study, a Recursive Least Squares (RLS)-augmented Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework is designed and validated for real-time energy management of four different EV powertrain architectures: Battery Electric Vehicle (BEV), Battery-Supercapacitor Hybrid, Battery-Flywheel Hybrid, and Battery-ICE Hybrid. The architecture is built in MATLAB/Simulink R2022b; an RLS subsystem is used to adapt in real time the battery impedance parameters. Representative multi-regime drive cycles were used to evaluate all eight quantitative metrics of performance. RLS-MPC constantly outperformed the rule-based control for all the architectures. The velocity tracking RMSE was reduced by 10.4% (BEV), 14.9% (Supercapacitor), and 13.9% (ICE Hybrid). Energy use was lowered for BEV (−4.5%) and Supercapacitor (−3.7%) architectures, and auxiliary energy use was shown to be greater for hybrid architectures: +61.5% (Supercapacitor), +430.6% (Flywheel), and +73.7% (ICE Hybrid), with auxiliary storage pre-positioned in advance of an expected deceleration. The Supercapacitor-MPC configuration was able to operate with a near-zero net battery draw (+0.006 kWh) compared to the baseline. Flywheel-MPC had a final state-of-charge of 84.7% (when including conversion losses, this was not yet energy neutral, but close). The vectorized MATLAB implementation required less than 30 μs to compute one step; the projected embedded execution time on automotive microcontroller hardware is estimated to be between 20–40 ms, consistent with the 100 ms sampling budget. RLS-MPC has great promise for future use with next-generation electrified powertrains, and future work will focus on embeddability.
Read Full Literature

Correlated Market Trend: Automotive Engineering

Bridging academia to market: The 60-day public search velocity mapping directly to the core technology of this paper. Dashed line represents 7-day moving average.

AI Semantic Synergy Context

Connecting this academic literature to real-world market discussions and products.

openalex.org › research concept
0%

Digital-twin-enabled reinforcement learning for energy-efficient and reliability-aware software-defined electric vehicles

Software-defined electric vehicles (SDEVs) require intelligent control frameworks that simultaneously optimize energy efficiency and powertrain reliability. However, existing studies typically trea...

crossref.org › academic paper
0%

Next Generation of Electric Vehicles: AI-Driven Approaches for Predictive Maintenance and Battery Management

This review explores recent advancements in electric vehicles (EVs), focusing on the transformative role of artificial intelligence (AI) in battery management systems (BMSs) and system control tech...

roipad.com › narrative analysis
0%

Stator

Technical advancements in motor control are evident with new model-free predictive control strategies for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (PMSM). Electric vehicle technology continues to rely o...

openalex.org › research concept
0%

A Rolling-Horizon Model Predictive Control Energy Management System for Shaping the Ports of the Future

Smart-port decarbonisation requires operations-research decision support under day-ahead uncertainty. We present a rolling-horizon Model Predictive Control Energy Management System, formulated as a...

openalex.org › research concept
0%

A Comprehensive Study on Optimizing Electric Vehicle Performance through Integrated Regenerative Braking, Thermal Management, and Drivetrain Systems

As the global automotive landscape accelerates toward full electrification, the traditional focus on individual component efficiency is no longer sufficient to meet the demand for extended range an...

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

Curated market intelligence mapped to this research.

What is the core focus of the research titled 'RLE-Based Model Predictive Control vs. Rule-Based Control for Energy Management in Multi-Architecture Electric Vehicles'?

This literature focuses on: Energy management is a key factor in the range, safety and battery life of electrified vehicles. In this study, a Recursive Least Squares (RLS)-augmented Model Predictive Control (MPC) framework is designed and validated for real-time energy manag...

What other academic literature is closely related to 'RLE-Based Model Predictive Control vs. Rule-Based Control for Energy Management in Multi-Architecture Electric Vehicles'?

Yes, highly correlated activity was mapped. An entry titled 'Digital-twin-enabled reinforcement learning for energy-efficient and reliability-aware software-defined electric vehicles' discusses this: Software-defined electric vehicles (SDEVs) require intelligent control frameworks that simultaneously optimize energy efficiency and powertrain rel...

Are there commercial applications of 'RLE-Based Model Predictive Control vs. Rule-Based Control for Energy Management in Multi-Architecture Electric Vehicles' in market news publications?

Yes, highly correlated activity was mapped. An entry titled 'Stator' discusses this: Technical advancements in motor control are evident with new model-free predictive control strategies for Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors (PMSM...

Cite this Market Intelligence Report

Reference our AI-mapped synergy between this research and the commercial market to instantly build authority.