SaaS Metrics
Gemini Executive Synthesis
Feature request for bulk selection and deletion of orphaned files, and clarification on scan accuracy.
Technical Positioning
Efficient and user-friendly cleanup; accurate identification of deletable files; transparent operation.
SaaS Insight & Market Implications
This feature request highlights a significant usability gap in PureMac's orphaned file cleanup. Users with large numbers of orphaned files (e.g., 2k+) require bulk selection and deletion capabilities, which are currently absent. The inability to `Cmd+A` or `shift select` creates a tedious manual process, directly hindering efficiency. The user's query about the scan's accuracy ('might be getting some needed files?') also reveals a lack of trust or transparency in the orphaned file identification process. For a cleaner, both efficiency and accuracy are paramount. Addressing this requires implementing robust bulk actions and potentially improving the clarity or confidence in the orphaned file detection algorithm.
Proprietary Technical Taxonomy
Raw Developer Origin & Technical Request
GitHub Issue
Apr 15, 2026
Repo: momenbasel/PureMac
[Feature] Orphaned -> select all -> delete
**What would you like?**
After scanning orphaned files I would like to delete them all. I have over 2k files there. It's almost impossible to pick them all by hand. Cmd+A doesn't work either. I suspect it is intentional. If so, why? Is there possibility that the orphaned file scan is actually might be getting some needed files? How does it work?
**Why is this useful?**
Makes the cleanup much faster.
**Alternatives considered**
Maybe using shift select for ranges of files? Like in normal filesystem applications to pick files there is a possibility to select using shift or cmd.
Developer Debate & Comments
Just want to up-vote this. Would be a great enhancement.
For me Start Scan reports that 2.53 GB was freed and Scan Again reports exactly the same size. It doesn't remove anything even after Full Disk Access was explicitly granted. At least I was able to uninstall it :)
Yeah, this enhancement would be great. But, I have also consideration how much safe the deletes all orphaned files? Because when I examined them, I saw that some files were associated with applications that were still in use, not those that are leftovers.
We should all east be able to select multiple files and then deselect the stuff we want to keep/investigate.
This is already in the shipped app. "Select All" / "Deselect All" lives in the Orphaned Files toolbar (top-right) and toggles based on current selection. It shipped in v2.0.0 via [`d0b0653`](https://github.com/momenbasel/PureMac/commit/d0b0653) ("Harden orphan cleanup and add bulk selection") and is still present in v2.1.0. v2.1.0 also tightens the uninstall safety path so bulk delete still rejects any high-risk home dotpath (`~/.ssh`, `~/.aws`, `~/.claude`, etc.) even when they somehow end up in the selection. Release: https://github.com/momenbasel/PureMac/releases/tag/v2.1.0 Closing as implemented. If the Select All button isn't appearing for you on the latest version, please reopen with a screenshot.
Adjacent Repository Pain Points
Other highly discussed features and pain points extracted from momenbasel/PureMac.
Extracted Positioning
Ineffective or non-functional application uninstallation feature.
Comprehensive and reliable application uninstallation; clear user feedback on deletion status.
Extracted Positioning
Inconsistent version reporting between download source and application's 'About' information.
Clear and accurate product versioning; professional software presentation.
Extracted Positioning
Allow-list bypass vulnerability due to incorrect path prefix matching without trailing slash.
Secure file system operations; accurate allow-list validation; preventing unauthorized file deletion.
Extracted Positioning
Zero-click data loss vulnerability through environmental variable injection and insecure default scheduling.
Secure system interaction; preventing unauthorized data deletion; robust environment variable handling; secure default configurations.
Extracted Positioning
Time-of-check to time-of-use (TOCTOU) vulnerability in file deletion logic, allowing symlink-based allow-list bypass.
Secure file system operations; preventing unauthorized file deletion; robust symlink handling.
Frequently Asked Questions
Market intelligence mapped to Feature request for bulk selection and deletion of orphaned files, and clarification on scan accuracy..
What is the technical positioning of Feature request for bulk selection and deletion of orphaned files, and clarification on scan accuracy.?
Based on our AI analysis of the original developer request, its primary technical positioning is: Efficient and user-friendly cleanup; accurate identification of deletable files; transparent operation.
How is the developer community reacting to Feature request for bulk selection and deletion of orphaned files, and clarification on scan accuracy.?
Yes, we have tracked 2 direct responses and active debates regarding this specific topic originating from GitHub Issue.
What are the foundational technologies related to Feature request for bulk selection and deletion of orphaned files, and clarification on scan accuracy.?
Our proprietary extraction maps Feature request for bulk selection and deletion of orphaned files, and clarification on scan accuracy. to adjacent architectural concepts including orphaned files, select all, delete all, Cmd+A.
Engagement Signals
Cross-Market Term Frequency
Quantifies the cross-market adoption of foundational terms like orphaned files and select all by tracking occurrence frequency across active SaaS architectures and enterprise developer debates.