AI-driven educational content generation, quizzing mechanics, and course progression.

I've spent the last while having it run me through the entirety of Rudin's principles of mathematical analysis with quizzes, then each question in detail. Very nostalgic as a maths teacher. Bravo on this app man.

I will be posting issues here as I run the course through completion. So far, I have noticed that (which are small issues from a learner's perspective):

25th October 2026
- Specific stylistic choices with proofs means some of the writing isn't consistent (I am using DeepSeek). For example, construction-based writing is preferred for me and students, but one style isn't preferred over the other, making some of the multiple-choice questions difficult to parse. As a specific example, it might use x in X in some continuinity statement, but it will define x at the end of the statement, which isn't OK.
- I can tell the program I want the entirety of the course (it knows what it is), but it will still quiz me on each topic one by one before making a graph outline like I asked it to in the first message. This cost me about 12 cents and time, and it also made some dangerous assumptions about things when I would guess the answer but still get it right. One question per chapter is too broad, especially in Rudin's book. A longer proping session (or making it adjustable length) would be good for this (some chapters have about 40 definitions, but the questions themselves per chapter would use 3-4 of them).

I'll update this as I go.

Kind regards,

Jon