SaaS Metrics
Product Hunt
Epismo OS
Keep your work when you switch AI tools
Epismo keeps your team’s AI work in a Case: the result, the decisions behind it, reviews, and the next step. Switch between AI tools or teammates without a re-brief. Auto review gives a saved result a fresh review, flags issues, and leaves the original unchanged.
View Raw Thread
Developer & User Discourse
[Redacted] • Sep 20, 2026
this is your 7th launch on here, so I'm curious what's actually new in this one versus the previous rounds rather than a repackaged pitch. what specifically changed in the product since your last launch that justifies coming back to PH again
[Redacted] • Sep 19, 2026
I built Epismo because I was tired of being the integration layer between AI tools.
We start in ChatGPT, continue in Claude, finish something in Cursor, then hand it to a teammate. The models are getting very good at the job, but the work still does not move with them.
A draft can move. The decision behind it does not.
That happened while preparing this launch, before we were using Epismo for it. We had already decided not to say that Epismo automatically captures every conversation. A draft moved from one AI to another, but that decision did not travel with it, and the next version implied exactly that.
Nothing was wrong with the model. We had copied the text, not the work around it.
Epismo gives that work a place to live outside any one chat: the current result, the decisions behind it, reviews, and the next step, all in a Case.
We used Epismo to prepare this launch itself, connecting the positioning, launch video, sales pitch, and this PH launch. You can inspect the actual trail here: https://epismo.ai/cases/0fc62bb1...
Once the work is gathered, Auto review can give the saved result a fresh second look without another round of copy-paste. It flags issues while leaving the original unchanged, so the next person or AI can continue with the context in view.
A shared doc can hold a draft. A task tracker can hold an owner. An AI chat holds a session.
Epismo holds the active state of the work.
If you already move between AI tools and teammates on the same job, I’d love to know: what would Epismo need to preserve before you’d trust it with your own work?
We start in ChatGPT, continue in Claude, finish something in Cursor, then hand it to a teammate. The models are getting very good at the job, but the work still does not move with them.
A draft can move. The decision behind it does not.
That happened while preparing this launch, before we were using Epismo for it. We had already decided not to say that Epismo automatically captures every conversation. A draft moved from one AI to another, but that decision did not travel with it, and the next version implied exactly that.
Nothing was wrong with the model. We had copied the text, not the work around it.
Epismo gives that work a place to live outside any one chat: the current result, the decisions behind it, reviews, and the next step, all in a Case.
We used Epismo to prepare this launch itself, connecting the positioning, launch video, sales pitch, and this PH launch. You can inspect the actual trail here: https://epismo.ai/cases/0fc62bb1...
Once the work is gathered, Auto review can give the saved result a fresh second look without another round of copy-paste. It flags issues while leaving the original unchanged, so the next person or AI can continue with the context in view.
A shared doc can hold a draft. A task tracker can hold an owner. An AI chat holds a session.
Epismo holds the active state of the work.
If you already move between AI tools and teammates on the same job, I’d love to know: what would Epismo need to preserve before you’d trust it with your own work?