Market Trends
chatgptprojects/clear-code
See your claude code logs in clear details in your dashboard
View Origin LinkProduct Positioning & Context
AI Executive Synthesis
Controlled and secure release management, while maintaining developer accessibility. Balancing internal release protocols with external usability.
The inability to install or build due to a `prepare` script enforcing `AUTHORIZED` environment variable checks is a critical barrier to entry. This indicates an internal release mechanism has leaked into the public distribution, preventing legitimate developer installation. While aiming for controlled publishing, this implementation directly obstructs external users, rendering the product inaccessible. This failure in release configuration severely impacts developer experience and adoption. It signals a lack of distinction between internal development workflows and public consumption, undermining the product's market viability and perceived professionalism. Immediate remediation is required to enable basic functionality.
See your claude code logs in clear details in your dashboard
Active Developer Issues (GitHub)
Logged: Apr 1, 2026
Logged: Mar 31, 2026
Logged: Mar 31, 2026
Logged: Mar 31, 2026
Community Voice & Feedback
Also the code is still there: https://github.com/chatgptprojects/clear-code/tree/37f56bcbf0ae2ae98c7a147c5ac167d5121a30f5
```shell
$ git clone git@github.com:chatgptprojects/clear-code.git
$ mv clear-code claude-code
$ cd claude-code
$ git checkout 37f56bcbf0ae2ae98c7a147c5ac167d5121a30f5
```
The point is that if you want to shill your plugin or whatever you're still violating their copyright and they can easily still come after you.
```shell
$ git clone git@github.com:chatgptprojects/clear-code.git
$ mv clear-code claude-code
$ cd claude-code
$ git checkout 37f56bcbf0ae2ae98c7a147c5ac167d5121a30f5
```
The point is that if you want to shill your plugin or whatever you're still violating their copyright and they can easily still come after you.
A "bit misleading" is understatement of the century
I totally agree. It does feel a bit misleading to reuse a repo that gained stars from a completely different project. I’ve already created a Pull Request to address this I'm guessing the owner just forgot to update/change it during the transition.
It's because this repo used to contain the Claude Code source and gained a bunch of stars, but was then removed via DMCA takedown: https://github.com/chatgptprojects/clear-code/commit/1fd721ee13a2cb0b326505f42d7d8877f75fb94d
So the pivot of changing this repo to something else rather than archiving (in order to carry over the stars) feels a bit like a rugpull to me.
So the pivot of changing this repo to something else rather than archiving (in order to carry over the stars) feels a bit like a rugpull to me.
Related Early-Stage Discoveries
Discovery Source
GitHub Open Source Aggregated via automated community intelligence tracking.
Tech Stack Dependencies
No direct open-source NPM package mentions detected in the product documentation.
Media Tractions & Mentions
No mainstream media stories specifically mentioning this product name have been intercepted yet.
Deep Research & Science
No direct peer-reviewed scientific literature matched with this product's architecture.