← Back to Product Feed

GitHub Open Source OpenCoworkAI/open-codesign

Open-source Claude Design alternative. One-click import your Claude Code / Codex API key. Prompt → prototype / slides / PDF. Multi-model (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Kimi, GLM, Ollama). BYOK, local-first, MIT.

3,888
Traction Score
386
Forks
Apr 18, 2026
Launch Date
View Origin Link

Product Positioning & Context

Open-source Claude Design alternative. One-click import your Claude Code / Codex API key. Prompt → prototype / slides / PDF. Multi-model (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Kimi, GLM, Ollama). BYOK, local-first, MIT.
ai-design anthropic byok claude claude-code claude-design claude-design-alternative deepseek

Related Ecosystem & Alternatives

Discover adjacent products, open-source repositories, and developer tools sharing similar technical architecture.

Deep-Dive FAQs

What is OpenCoworkAI/open-codesign?
OpenCoworkAI/open-codesign is a digital product or tool described as: Open-source Claude Design alternative. One-click import your Claude Code / Codex API key. Prompt → prototype / slides / PDF. Multi-model (Claude, G...
Where did OpenCoworkAI/open-codesign originate?
Data for OpenCoworkAI/open-codesign was aggregated directly from the GitHub Open Source community ecosystem, representing raw developer and early-adopter sentiment.
When was OpenCoworkAI/open-codesign publicly launched?
The initial public indexing or launch date for OpenCoworkAI/open-codesign within our tracked developer communities was recorded on April 18, 2026.
How popular is OpenCoworkAI/open-codesign?
OpenCoworkAI/open-codesign has achieved measurable traction, logging over 3,888 traction score and facilitating 386 recorded discussions or engagements.
Which technical categories define OpenCoworkAI/open-codesign?
Based on metadata extraction, OpenCoworkAI/open-codesign is categorized under topics such as: ai-design, anthropic, byok, claude.
Are there active development issues for OpenCoworkAI/open-codesign?
Yes, we are currently tracking open architectural debates and bug reports for this project on GitHub. There are currently 2 active high-priority issues logged recently.
What are some commercial alternatives to OpenCoworkAI/open-codesign?
Our semantic intelligence engine identifies potential commercial alternatives in the SaaS space, such as Databerry, which offers overlapping value propositions.
How does the creator describe OpenCoworkAI/open-codesign?
The original author or development team describes the product as follows: "Open-source Claude Design alternative. One-click import your Claude Code / Codex API key. Prompt → prototype / slides / PDF. Multi-model (Claude, GPT, Gemini, Kimi, GLM, Ollama). BYOK, local-first,..."

Active Developer Issues (GitHub)

open bug(desktop): top bar active model can disagree with Settings current provider model
Logged: Apr 22, 2026
open 正常对话时报 403 错误:Error invoking remote method 'codesign:v1:generate'
Logged: Apr 22, 2026

Community Voice & Feedback

hqhq1025 • Apr 22, 2026
@Sun-sunshine06 同步一下进度 —— 你 4/22 02:51 提到正在修复,请问目前进度如何?

我这边正在并行做一个更通用的修复 PR(暂编号 #130 范围),把生成失败路径接到现有的 `diagnose()` hypothesis 系统,覆盖范围包括:

- 404 + custom baseUrl 不含 /v1 → `missingV1` hint + auto-fix
- 403 + body 含 `Your request was blocked` / `blocked` / Cloudflare ray id → 新增 `gatewayWafBlocked` hint(专门给本 issue 这种 WAF 拦截场景,避免被误归到 `keyInvalid` 让用户白查 API key)
- 401/403 不含 WAF 文案 → 维持 `keyInvalid`
- 500 + `not implemented` → 网关不支持 Messages API hint(与 #158 联动)
- 400 + `instructions are required` → 提示切换 wire 到 openai-chat(与 #134 联动)

如果你那边的修复方向不同/已经动手,麻烦贴一下 PR 链接或当前思路,避免重复工作。如果还没起手,我这个 PR 落地后会顺带 close 本 issue,你来 review 即可。

cc @hqhq1025
Sun-sunshine06 • Apr 22, 2026
Another potentially related signal: see #136.

In at least one user screenshot, the top bar shows the active model as `opus-4-7`, while the currently active provider card in Settings shows `claude-3-5-haiku-20241022` and is still marked `当前`.

That suggests the UI may be exposing two different model states at once (top-bar active vs provider-card default/resolved state). If true, this could make 403 debugging much harder because the user may think the generate request is using one model while the app internally resolves another.
Sun-sunshine06 • Apr 22, 2026
补一条同类现场证据,和本 issue 高度一致:

- 现象:生成阶段报错,弹窗内容为

```text
Error invoking remote method 'codesign:v1:generate': CodesignError: 403 Your request was blocked.
```

- 用户补充:`无论是 codex 还是 claude 都不行,是 cpa 反代的`
- 截图显示:UI 仍然只是通用的“生成失败 / 生成过程中出错了”,没有给出更可操作的代理/上游拦截解释

这条证据进一步支持当前判断:
- 测试连接可通过,不代表真实生成请求会通过
- 在反代 / 中转 / 自定义 provider 场景下,生成请求路径更容易被上游策略拦截
- 问题并不局限于单一模型,至少用户反馈里 `codex` 和 `claude` 两条链路都可能触发同类 403 blocked

建议把这类 case 一并纳入该问题,而不是按单个模型拆散处理。若后续需要,可再补 diagnostics zip / main.log 佐证。
github-actions[bot] • Apr 22, 2026
感谢反馈,复现描述很清楚。

从当前代码看,这个现象是可能出现的:**“测试连接”与“正常对话生成”走的是不同请求路径**。
- 设置页“测试连接”只探测 provider 的 `/models` 可达性与鉴权。
- 聊天对话会走 `codesign:v1:generate`,再进入真实的生成请求(模型推理调用)。

所以会出现“测试连接通过,但生成时报 403(Your request was blocked)”的情况:`/models` 可用不代表生成端点一定放行。

另外,当前诊断里会把 `403` 和 `401` 归到同一类(密钥/权限问题),因此提示可能偏泛化。

**Relevant code:**
- `apps/desktop/src/renderer/src/components/Settings.tsx:286` — 设置页“测试连接”调用 `connection.testProvider(...)`
- `apps/desktop/src/main/connection-ipc.ts:410` — `runProviderTest` 仅对 `/models` 做 GET 探测
- `apps/desktop/src/main/connection-ipc.ts:426` — 非 2xx 时按 HTTP 状态返回连接测试错误
- `apps/desktop/src/main/index.ts:448` — 对话生成走 `codesign:v1:generate`
- `apps/desktop/src/main/index.ts:581` — 生成调用 `runGenerate(...)`(真实模型请求)
- `apps/desktop/src/main/connection-ipc.ts:205` — `403` 被归类为 `401` 类别
- `packages/shared/src/diagnostics.ts:61` — 诊断里 `401/403` 同归 `keyInvalid`
- `README.md:119` — 当前发布仍是 `v0.1.x` 早期阶段

**Need more info:**
- 你当前“激活中的 provider / model / baseUrl”分别是什么?
- 是否使用了中转网关或自定义 `baseUrl...
Sun-sunshine06 • Apr 22, 2026
正在修复此问题。测试连接和实际调用的请求方式可能存在差异(如 model 参数、请求头、endpoint 不同),导致 403 策略拦截。

Discovery Source

GitHub Open Source GitHub Open Source

Aggregated via automated community intelligence tracking.

Tech Stack Dependencies

No direct open-source NPM package mentions detected in the product documentation.

Media Tractions & Mentions

No mainstream media stories specifically mentioning this product name have been intercepted yet.

Deep Research & Science

No direct peer-reviewed scientific literature matched with this product's architecture.