xiaobright/dsh-anchored-standard

This issue reveals a critical ambiguity in the dsh-anchored-standard preset's 'two-phase' reasoning model. The user is unclear whether the initial 'minimal' state applies to a single turn or the entire session before transitioning to 'full tools.' This lack of clarity indicates a gap in documentation or intuitive design regarding the state transitions of the reasoning chain. For a sophisticated preset, predictable and well-understood behavior is paramount. Ambiguity around when advanced tools become active can lead to user frustration, incorrect expectations, and suboptimal agent performance. Clear definition of 'turn' versus 'session' scope for reasoning modes is essential for user confidence and effective utilization of the preset's capabilities.