← Back to Product Feed

Hacker News Show HN: Boo – Screen-style terminal multiplexer built on libghostty

No tagline provided.

83
Traction Score
27
Discussions
Jun 12, 2026
Launch Date
View Origin Link

Product Positioning & Context

Related Ecosystem & Alternatives

Discover adjacent products, open-source repositories, and developer tools sharing similar technical architecture.

Deep-Dive FAQs

What is Boo – Screen-style terminal multiplexer built on libghostty?
Boo – Screen-style terminal multiplexer built on libghostty is a digital product or tool described as:
Where did Boo – Screen-style terminal multiplexer built on libghostty originate?
Data for Boo – Screen-style terminal multiplexer built on libghostty was aggregated directly from the Hacker News community ecosystem, representing raw developer and early-adopter sentiment.
When was Boo – Screen-style terminal multiplexer built on libghostty publicly launched?
The initial public indexing or launch date for Boo – Screen-style terminal multiplexer built on libghostty within our tracked developer communities was recorded on June 12, 2026.
How popular is Boo – Screen-style terminal multiplexer built on libghostty?
Boo – Screen-style terminal multiplexer built on libghostty has achieved measurable traction, logging over 83 traction score and facilitating 27 recorded discussions or engagements.
What are some commercial alternatives to Boo – Screen-style terminal multiplexer built on libghostty?
Our semantic intelligence engine identifies potential commercial alternatives in the SaaS space, such as Teable 3.0, which offers overlapping value propositions.

Community Voice & Feedback

SwiftyBug • Jun 12, 2026
Slightly off-topic:I currently use tmux. Not because I need to multiplex shells in a remote server, but because I like to have my sessions persisted in my local machine. Even between reboots (technically not the same session, but the same tabs and splits I had). I currently have that with tmux and a tmux plugin that restores my sessions. But I think that tmux is overkill for this. And if I'm in a tmux session, then I can't use my terminal emulator's native tabs and splits. Does anyone have a recommendation of how to handle only terminal sessions on Linux?
KolenCh • Jun 12, 2026
How would this compare to shpool: https://github.com/shell-pool/shpool
miningmai • Jun 12, 2026
Interesting choice building on libghostty —
how does it handle session persistence across reconnects?
lavaman131 • Jun 12, 2026
This is super cool. I've been a heavy tmux user for a long time and using it more with my coding agent sessions and prefer ghostty. What was the biggest challenge when it came to building a multiplexer directly on top of libghostty that you ran into?
ac29 • Jun 12, 2026
Been using zmx for a few months and love it: https://github.com/neurosnap/zmx/Very similar, based on libghostty
boltguo • Jun 12, 2026
Really dig the minimal approach here. Swapping the backend to libghostty is exactly the kind of clean architecture we need. Going to test drive this today.
johnfn • Jun 11, 2026
I think Cmux is the incumbent in the "screen-style terminal multiplexer built on libghostty" - any key differentiators here? https://cmux.com/
darkteflon • Jun 11, 2026
Installed using the curl-to-bash on Sequoia and I’m getting “error: ReadOnlyFileSystem” on ‘boo new’. Can’t see any open issues on gh and nothing in the readme.Definitely interested in something like this - love ghostty and I’ve been finding Zellij a bit crashy recently (plus I don’t really need tabs).
asar • Jun 11, 2026
this looks nice! i've been using herdr the last couple of weeks as a terminal multiplexer for agents, which works amazingly well.
stereo • Jun 11, 2026
You've obviously written this because screen wasn't doing the right thing, but your readme only explains that it's a "young project, not a drop-in GNU screen replacement". What are its advantages over screen or tmux?

Discovery Source

Hacker News Hacker News

Aggregated via automated community intelligence tracking.

Tech Stack Dependencies

No direct open-source NPM package mentions detected in the product documentation.

Media Tractions & Mentions

No mainstream media stories specifically mentioning this product name have been intercepted yet.

Deep Research & Science

No direct peer-reviewed scientific literature matched with this product's architecture.