Stitch by Google

The sketch-to-production promise is genuinely exciting — the biggest friction in early product development has always been that painful gap between "I drew this on a whiteboard" and "a developer can actually build this." I'm curious how well it handles the messy reality of existing design systems and component libraries, because that's usually where these tools either earn their keep or fall apart. Does Stitch let you map generated components to your own established token sets, or does it output in its own opinionated system that you then need to reconcile?

The MCP export into Cursor is the feature I'd actually use daily. How opinionated is the generated code? With FuelOS I found AI-generated UI code was either too generic to ship or too tightly coupled to rework, and that middle ground is where most tools fall apart.

Absolutely loved the description! Excited to test it with PostGod and other future ideas I'll have hihi 🤩

I used this tool to design one of my mobile applications with two pages. Initially, the style couldn't be consistently maintained, but after some adjustments through discussions, it improved. However, there are still minor layout flaws, making it hard to achieve complete uniformity, such as the menu's position and style—I'm not sure if it's because I didn't use it correctly. Overall, though, I'm very satisfied with the design style. It's already quite beautiful because I couldn't describe the effect I wanted in words, but Stitch perfectly presented what I had in mind.

@logankilpatrick Hi Logan. Does it teach design principles like spacing, layout, accessibility, or does it just generate designs? Can I learn UI/UX design by using Stitch, or will I become dependent on it?

First time seeing this. Super impressive.

I have used it since it was launched. It is helpful with great UX ideas.Just if they can switch the toggle of web and mobile app would be convinent for me as a web designer xD

Google is quietly turning Stitch into something much bigger than a UI generator 👀The new Hatter agent hints at multi-step, reasoning-driven design workflows, not just one-shot mockups. If this connects to their “Deep Design” system, we might be looking at AI that actually thinks through product structure, not just visuals.What stood out to me?Auto-generated App Store assets (screenshots + descriptions + icon) 🔥Native MCP export directly into Cursor, Claude Code, Gemini CLI 🔌That’s design → store-ready → dev environment in one flow.Google is clearly building Stitch into a serious end-to-end product design engine. Would you trust an agent to handle full multi-step UI flows or do you still prefer manual iteration?