PaymentKit

I like this as revenue-side redundancy. AI founders obsess over multi-model routing for COGS; surprisingly few apply the same resilience logic to the revenue pipe.

Really like the idea of treating payment processors as replaceable infrastructure instead of something your entire billing stack depends on. Curious how hard it is to migrate an existing saas with active subscriptions into this app?

Your own subscription brands were running on this before anyone else could buy it. Congrats on the launch. That is a lot of trust to put in your own code.

One major callout: If you run subscriptions, VAMP and GMAP should be on your radar.It's Visa/MC's monitoring programs: your fraud and dispute counts get combined into one ratio, and crossing the threshold gets your processor fined for keeping you. That's why merchants get dropped "out of nowhere." Most founders hear about it for the first time in a warning email, or sometimes just get dropped with no notice.PaymentKit attacks both sides of the ratio. Smart routing controls which processor each transaction lands on so no single account's ratio collapses, and can be adjusted in real time based on need. AI-driven dunning recovers failed payments without retry storms that inflate fraud signals. Built-in fraud controls stop disputes before they're born.We built this running 20+ subscription brands of our own, several in high-risk categories. Ask me anything about VAMP or multi-processor setups.

Congrats on shipping! Processor shutdowns are a total nightmare for SaaS businesses, so having built-in failovers for billing infrastructure is a huge stress reliever. Smart problem to tackle head-on.

Been using Payment Kit for a few months and I gotta say aside from the simple and seamless integration the product has really delivered. Ive created a few routing rules to test and now am moving the majority/all of our payments through Payment Kit.

Payment reliability does not get enough attention until billing suddenly stops working. Building resilience into the payment layer from the beginning seems like a much better approach than reacting after a shutdown.

Been burned by a processor freeze before so this hits close to home. Curious how long it actually takes to add a new processor once you're set up.

Really interesting approach to making billing more resilient. Processor dependency is a bigger risk than many teams realize.

A strong solution for companies managing recurring payments. Reducing single points of failure can make a big difference.

I really love this idea because a processor going down can cause a lot of issue. keeping subscriptions running in the background could save businnesses a lot of stress.

Smart approach to reducing processor dependency. This could save teams a lot of headaches.

I like that this came out of a real internal problem instead of a market gap search. That usually means the edge cases are already handled.

Can recurring billing switch processors without touching customers?

Multi processor routing makes a lot sense for recurring businesses. Nice launch.