Visual PR Testing with AI

Congrats on the launch! This is a compelling take on QA automation. I'm curious about how QA.tech handles the nuances of testing products with complex user flows or those requiring specific business logic validation. Do your agents learn from existing test cases, or do they generate test scenarios from scratch by exploring the product?

how do you handle flaky tests eating the pr signal? every team i've seen roll out automated pr checks ends up with devs reflexively re-running until green, at which point the whole system is just theater. wondering whats the stance is

Ahh that sounds cool. so is it like: 1. Login commit change. 2. AI writes tests to focus on login UX 3. Runs tests in headless CI browser. 4. Shhows result in pr?

PR review is the bottleneck every team complains about but no one fixes. Curious what the false-positive rate looks like in practice — does the agent flag cosmetic changes (whitespace, renames) as issues, or only real regressions? Congrats on launch 🚀

"That's weird. It works on my machine." If I had a cent for every time I've heard that, I wouldn't need to work anymore. We're fixing one of the most painful parts of development: testing new things while they're still being built. From the developer side, you want fast feedback, clear repro steps, and all of it while you're still in the zone. From the quality side, we bring your requirements into one place and help make sure every PR meets the bar, whether it was written by a human or generated by AI. Built on Vercel (vercel functions, ai-sdk, nextjs hosted on vercel) and works out of the box with Environments and Preview Deployments. Give it a try and let me know what you think!