Free AI SEO Auditor

This is super relevant for us. We have 30+ programmatic landing pages (airport-specific) and we've been optimizing purely for google. Never thought about how AI search engines parse them. going to run our pages through this today. does the scoring weight structured data / schema markup heavily, or is it more about content signals?

Hey I just found out you website is pretty good and shows amazing resutls. I just tested my website getdetach.com and it shows results that I really want for my site. Now I will improve my SEO and will again test it. Thanks!

Hi Yahia, really glad I came across your tool — just gave it a spin on my site falcondrivelabs, which I know could use some SEO polishing. Curious to see the findings and recommended fixes.One quick general question: when a free tool runs AI-powered analysis, I always wonder — who's footing the bill for the tokens?

This is great timing — I've been thinking a lot about how AI search changes the game for niche tools like mine. I built YTubViral (14 AI tools for YouTube creators) and realized halfway through that optimizing for traditional Google SEO wasn't enough anymore. Creators are starting to ask ChatGPT and Claude things like "best tool for YouTube titles" instead of searching Google.Quick question: does the audit cover structured data and schema markup, or is it more focused on content signals? That's been the hardest part for me to get right.

"AI search era" is the right framing most SEO audits are still optimized for traditional search and ignore how LLMs crawl and surface content. Does it check for things like llms.txt and structured data specifically?

I just tested my website Clearlist.me and it got 82 out of 100 and got really cool tips on how to even improve more. I do like how easy it is to just copy the recommendations and hand them to my agent.

Do you support AEO?

Bookmarking this — I'm literally in the middle of SEO auditing my own launch today. Will run it through. Congrats 🚀

Tested Free AI SEO Auditor on CambrianEdge.ai and got a solid 93/100.Really liked the concept overall, especially the “copy full prompt” feature. Makes the workflow much smoother when you want to iterate quickly instead of rewriting things manually.One feature that could make this even more useful would be the ability to export/download the report as an image or PDF. Feels like something teams would want to share internally or attach to audits.Great work on this, @yahia_bakour3

Really interesting tool. The recommendations actually feel useful and well-reasoned, not the usual "keep your title under 80 characters" type of advice. Picked up some new insights I hadn't considered before.Special shoutout to the "Copy Fix Prompt" feature, that's a genuinely clever idea. Makes it super easy to take the suggestions straight into your workflow.Nice work!

Hey Yahia, congratulations on the launch!I tried your tool on vaulternal.com and got an 83/100 - which is actually a pretty solid score. The main area that seems to need improvement (according to your tool) is the "Citation Surface Presence" metric, so I'll take a closer look at that. You can see the audit here: https://www.freeaiseoaudit.com/audit/vaulternal.comOut of curiosity, are you planning to monetize the tool at some point? Having "free" in the domain name might make that a bit tricky down the road.Good luck with the project!

Hey, nice tool. I just tested it on my website maamria.com.My site is still new, and Google Search Console is currently showing that only a few pages are indexed. I have around 75 pages not indexed, including many marked as "Discovered – currently not indexed"Your tool gave my site a score of 31/100 and marked it as critical. It also detected things like very low visible content, only one heading, no external links, and no JSON-LD.So my question is does this result look normal for a new website that Google has not fully indexed yet? And do you think the score from your tool matches what Google Search Console is showing?Also, from your point of view, what should I fix first to make the site easier for AI search engines like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity to understand?Thanks, I’m testing the tool and it looks useful.

Hey PH 👋

Every founder I talk to is asking the same thing: "is ChatGPT citing us?"

Nobody has a clean way to find out. Traditional SEO tools score you on Google. The AI-visibility startups want $500/mo and a sales call before they tell you anything.

So we built the free, open-source version.

Paste a URL → ~30 seconds later you get:

→ A 0–100 visibility score for ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity
→ A breakdown of what's actually hurting your AI citations (llms.txt, schema, JS rendering, freshness, structure)
→ A copy-paste fix prompt — hand it to Cursor or Claude Code, and the fixes ship themselves

No signup. No sales call. Code's on GitHub.