Gastrointestinal motility in microgravity: a critical review of multi-level mechanisms and model-dependent effects

Background Gastrointestinal motility disturbances rank among the most frequently reported medical complications of spaceflight. Astronauts experience delayed gastric emptying, erratic small intestinal transit and reduced colonic propulsion. The underlying mechanisms are multifactorial. Microgravity alters intra-abdominal physical mechanics, disrupts autonomic and enteric neural circuits, shifts gastrointestinal hormone secretion profiles, inflicts oxidative stress upon effector cells, and perturbs gut microbial communities. Cross-model comparisons reveal substantial disagreement, suggesting that no single ground-based analog fully captures the pathophysiology of orbital flight. Aim To critically review how weightlessness affects gastric emptying, small intestinal transit and colonic motility; to critically evaluate contradictory findings across simulation platforms; and to delineate the neural, humoral, cellular and microbiological mechanisms involved. Methods We searched PubMed, Web of Science and the NASA Technical Reports Server for articles published between January 1990 and June 2026 (last search 30 June 2026). Search terms included: “microgravity”, “weightlessness”, “spaceflight”, “gastrointestinal motility”, “gastric emptying”, “intestinal transit”, “gut microbiome”, “interstitial cells of Cajal” and “oxidative stress”. Studies using head-down bed rest, hindlimb unloading, clinorotation, parabolic flight and actual spaceflight were included. The review follows a critical narrative design; the full search strategy and the framework used to appraise the evidence are described in Section 1.1. Results Altered-gravity studies suggest that gastrointestinal dysmotility may involve neurohumoral dysregulation, oxidative injury to interstitial cells of Cajal and smooth muscle, barrier dysfunction and altered enteric signaling ; however, most mechanistic evidence derives from simulated models and has not been directly validated during human spaceflight. Direct human motility measurements remain sparse, and the evidence comprises a mixture of direct observations, model-dependent inferences and testable hypotheses. Cross-study agreement is poor: some head-down bed rest trials report accelerated small-bowel transit, whereas tail-suspension models and limited flight observations suggest motor suppression. These divergences may reflect model-specific confounding rather than a uniform effect of microgravity. Conclusion Current ground-based models each capture only partial aspects of orbital GI pathophysiology. Future work should combine multi-omics profiling with next-generation simulation platforms to develop evidence-based countermeasures for long-duration missions.