Originality and differentiation of OpenSpace amidst substantial overlap with EvoMap and Evolver

Hello OpenSpace team,

This repository raises a serious concern regarding originality, attribution, and project differentiation.

Based on the current public presentation of OpenSpace, the overlap with [EvoMap](evomap.ai and [evolver](github.com/autogame-17/evolv... appears substantial and difficult to dismiss as generic convergence within the same field. The issue is not merely that both projects work on agents. The concern is that the overlap extends across the public-facing product narrative, the packaging of reusable agent experience, the self-evolution framing, the cloud/community distribution model, and the lineage / audit style of presenting capability evolution.

At present, the community can reasonably ask whether OpenSpace is an independently differentiated project, or whether it is repackaging an already established direction without explicit acknowledgment.

This issue therefore requests a public clarification on the following points:

1. What are the concrete conceptual and product differences between OpenSpace and EvoMap?
2. Were [EvoMap](evomap.ai and [evolver](github.com/autogame-17/evolv... reviewed as prior art, related work, or an existing product in this space during the design of OpenSpace?
3. If yes, why is there currently no explicit attribution, comparison, or differentiation in the repository and documentation?
4. If no, what is the independent design timeline and rationale that led to such a highly similar framing...