Lack of clear user feedback regarding platform-specific model availability (EAC channel models like DeepSeek / Kimi) in `dsh-our-free-model` when running on non-desktop environments (dsh web / command line).
Raw Developer Origin & Technical Request
GitHub Issue
Oct 4, 2026
## 环境
- DSH 0.2.0-rc.2
- 运行方式:纯 dsh web / 命令行(非桌面端)
- 插件:dsh-our-free-model v1.4.4(仓库 zouyuxuan122/dsh-our-free-model,本机装在 `C:\Users\Administrator\.dsh\profiles\web\node_modules\dsh-our-free-model`)
- 系统:Windows
## 复现步骤
1. 在纯 dsh web 或命令行方式下安装并启用 dsh-our-free-model v1.4.4。
2. 打开模型选择器,查找 `EAC DeepSeek V4.1 Flash` 与 `EAC Kimi K3`。
3. 打开设置页,查找 EAC 渠道分组。
4. 查看启动日志与界面提示,确认是否有任何关于 EAC 渠道不可用的说明。
## 期望行为
非桌面宿主上应能看出「EAC 渠道不可用」是预期行为,而不是装坏了:界面或日志中应有一句静态说明,告知用户 EAC 渠道仅在桌面端可用。
## 实际行为
- 选择器中无 `EAC DeepSeek V4.1 Flash` / `EAC Kimi K3`。
- 设置页无 EAC 分组。
- 日志与界面均无任何提示,用户无法区分「装坏了」与「本来就不该出现」。
## 证据
- `README.md` L48 与 L482「EAC 渠道(桌面端专属)」:写明 EAC 渠道只在 DSHEAC AIO(Tauri 壳)与 DeepSeek Harness 桌面端(Electron 壳)两个桌面宿主解锁;「命令行、纯 dsh web、以及任何其它运行方式里,这条通道整体不存在:没有模型、没有请求、没有报错,连解密尝试都不会发生」。
- `src/vault.js` 的 `detectSealedHost()`:闸门代码,原只放行 Tauri 三信号或 `profileName === 'desktop'`,非桌面宿主直接封死该通道。
- `src/catalog.js` L145–147:模型名映射 `deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4.1-flash` → `DeepSeek V4.1 Flash`、`moonshotai/kimi-k2.6` → `Kimi K2.6`、`moonshotai/kimi-k3` → `Kimi K3`。
- 用户评论原话:「为什么我安装了新的没有看到可以用 deepseek 和 kimi?」
- 另一条易混淆事实:免费车道的 `deepseek-v4-flash-free` 因上游回 `Model is unavailable` 被移出下拉框(本机 `C:\Users\Administrator\.dsh\our-free-model\availability.json` 实测 `state: "unavailable"`,detail=`Model is unavailable.`),只在设置页保留拒因——`README.md` L380 有同样记录。
## 建议
- (a) 非桌面宿主在设置页 / 首启引导里给一句静态说明,如「EAC 渠道仅在桌面端可用」。
- (b) 启动时记一条可见日志,说明 EAC 渠道在当前宿主下整体不可用。
- (c) 设置页的拒因里写明免费车道 `deepseek-v4-flash-free` 与 EAC 渠道的区别,避免被当成同一个问题。
Developer Debate & Comments
No active discussions extracted for this entry yet.
Adjacent Repository Pain Points
Other highly discussed features and pain points extracted from zouyuxuan122/dsh-our-free-model.
该更新了
EAC模型好卡
Frequently Asked Questions
Market intelligence mapped to Lack of clear user feedback regarding platform-specific model availability (EAC channel models like DeepSeek / Kimi) in `dsh-our-free-model` when running on non-desktop environments (dsh web / command line)..
What problem does Lack of clear user feedback regarding platform-specific model availability (EAC channel models like DeepSeek / Kimi) in `dsh-our-free-model` when running on non-desktop environments (dsh web / command line). solve?
What architecture is tied to Lack of clear user feedback regarding platform-specific model availability (EAC channel models like DeepSeek / Kimi) in `dsh-our-free-model` when running on non-desktop environments (dsh web / command line).?
How does the GitHub community build with Lack of clear user feedback regarding platform-specific model availability (EAC channel models like DeepSeek / Kimi) in `dsh-our-free-model` when running on non-desktop environments (dsh web / command line).?
Engagement Signals
Cross-Market Term Frequency
Quantifies the cross-market adoption of foundational terms like README.md and 非桌面宿主 by tracking occurrence frequency across active SaaS architectures and enterprise developer debates.
SaaS Metrics