← Back to AI Insights
Gemini Executive Synthesis

Lack of clear user feedback regarding platform-specific model availability (EAC channel models like DeepSeek / Kimi) in `dsh-our-free-model` when running on non-desktop environments (dsh web / command line).

Technical Positioning
The plugin aims to provide free, unlimited access to frontier models. However, its current implementation creates user confusion by silently failing to display models unavailable on specific host environments, contradicting the expectation of clear communication.
SaaS Insight & Market Implications
This issue exposes a significant user experience flaw in `dsh-our-free-model`: the silent unavailability of EAC channel models (DeepSeek, Kimi) on non-desktop DSH environments. Users are left without any UI or log feedback, leading to confusion and the perception of a broken installation. This directly contradicts the plugin's promise of accessible models. The lack of explicit messaging about platform-specific limitations, despite being documented in the `README`, creates unnecessary support overhead and erodes user trust. Implementing clear in-app or log notifications is critical to manage user expectations and prevent perceived product failures, enhancing overall user satisfaction and reducing churn.
Proprietary Technical Taxonomy
非桌面宿主 dsh web / 命令行 dsh-our-free-model DeepSeek / Kimi 模型 模型选择器 EAC 渠道 DSH 0.2.0-rc.2 DSHEAC AIO (Tauri 壳)

Raw Developer Origin & Technical Request

Source Icon GitHub Issue Oct 4, 2026
Repo: zouyuxuan122/dsh-our-free-model
非桌面宿主(纯 dsh web / 命令行)安装插件后,DeepSeek / Kimi 模型从选择器消失且界面与日志均无任何可见提示

## 环境

- DSH 0.2.0-rc.2
- 运行方式:纯 dsh web / 命令行(非桌面端)
- 插件:dsh-our-free-model v1.4.4(仓库 zouyuxuan122/dsh-our-free-model,本机装在 `C:\Users\Administrator\.dsh\profiles\web\node_modules\dsh-our-free-model`)
- 系统:Windows

## 复现步骤

1. 在纯 dsh web 或命令行方式下安装并启用 dsh-our-free-model v1.4.4。
2. 打开模型选择器,查找 `EAC DeepSeek V4.1 Flash` 与 `EAC Kimi K3`。
3. 打开设置页,查找 EAC 渠道分组。
4. 查看启动日志与界面提示,确认是否有任何关于 EAC 渠道不可用的说明。

## 期望行为

非桌面宿主上应能看出「EAC 渠道不可用」是预期行为,而不是装坏了:界面或日志中应有一句静态说明,告知用户 EAC 渠道仅在桌面端可用。

## 实际行为

- 选择器中无 `EAC DeepSeek V4.1 Flash` / `EAC Kimi K3`。
- 设置页无 EAC 分组。
- 日志与界面均无任何提示,用户无法区分「装坏了」与「本来就不该出现」。

## 证据

- `README.md` L48 与 L482「EAC 渠道(桌面端专属)」:写明 EAC 渠道只在 DSHEAC AIO(Tauri 壳)与 DeepSeek Harness 桌面端(Electron 壳)两个桌面宿主解锁;「命令行、纯 dsh web、以及任何其它运行方式里,这条通道整体不存在:没有模型、没有请求、没有报错,连解密尝试都不会发生」。
- `src/vault.js` 的 `detectSealedHost()`:闸门代码,原只放行 Tauri 三信号或 `profileName === 'desktop'`,非桌面宿主直接封死该通道。
- `src/catalog.js` L145–147:模型名映射 `deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4.1-flash` → `DeepSeek V4.1 Flash`、`moonshotai/kimi-k2.6` → `Kimi K2.6`、`moonshotai/kimi-k3` → `Kimi K3`。
- 用户评论原话:「为什么我安装了新的没有看到可以用 deepseek 和 kimi?」
- 另一条易混淆事实:免费车道的 `deepseek-v4-flash-free` 因上游回 `Model is unavailable` 被移出下拉框(本机 `C:\Users\Administrator\.dsh\our-free-model\availability.json` 实测 `state: "unavailable"`,detail=`Model is unavailable.`),只在设置页保留拒因——`README.md` L380 有同样记录。

## 建议

- (a) 非桌面宿主在设置页 / 首启引导里给一句静态说明,如「EAC 渠道仅在桌面端可用」。
- (b) 启动时记一条可见日志,说明 EAC 渠道在当前宿主下整体不可用。
- (c) 设置页的拒因里写明免费车道 `deepseek-v4-flash-free` 与 EAC 渠道的区别,避免被当成同一个问题。

Developer Debate & Comments

No active discussions extracted for this entry yet.

Adjacent Repository Pain Points

Other highly discussed features and pain points extracted from zouyuxuan122/dsh-our-free-model.

Extracted Positioning
Failure to access specific AI models (DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Kimi) within the `dsh-our-free-model` plugin on the EAC desktop version, coupled with an 'upstream request failed: fetch failed' error.
The plugin aims to provide free, unlimited access to frontier models without login/API keys. The current issue indicates a failure to deliver on this core value proposition for specific models and environments.
Top Replies
Alice-and-moon • Oct 3, 2026
现在可以用了,作者辛苦了
zjt-ys • Oct 3, 2026
our free model closed the stream before its finish token, without answering; retrying 深度求索中
Rgxaa • Oct 3, 2026
opencode的问题,现已恢复
Top Replies
Rgxaa • Oct 3, 2026
一样
menghuanshiguang • Oct 3, 2026
一样
Rgxaa • Oct 3, 2026
opencode的问题,现已恢复

Frequently Asked Questions

Market intelligence mapped to Lack of clear user feedback regarding platform-specific model availability (EAC channel models like DeepSeek / Kimi) in `dsh-our-free-model` when running on non-desktop environments (dsh web / command line)..

What problem does Lack of clear user feedback regarding platform-specific model availability (EAC channel models like DeepSeek / Kimi) in `dsh-our-free-model` when running on non-desktop environments (dsh web / command line). solve?
Based on our AI analysis of the original developer request, its primary technical positioning is: The plugin aims to provide free, unlimited access to frontier models. However, its current implementation creates user confusion by silently failing to display models unavailable on specific host environments, contradicting the expectation of clear communication.
What architecture is tied to Lack of clear user feedback regarding platform-specific model availability (EAC channel models like DeepSeek / Kimi) in `dsh-our-free-model` when running on non-desktop environments (dsh web / command line).?
Our proprietary extraction maps Lack of clear user feedback regarding platform-specific model availability (EAC channel models like DeepSeek / Kimi) in `dsh-our-free-model` when running on non-desktop environments (dsh web / command line). to adjacent architectural concepts including 非桌面宿主, dsh web / 命令行, dsh-our-free-model, DeepSeek / Kimi 模型.
How does the GitHub community build with Lack of clear user feedback regarding platform-specific model availability (EAC channel models like DeepSeek / Kimi) in `dsh-our-free-model` when running on non-desktop environments (dsh web / command line).?
Yes, open-source adoption is correlated. An active project titled 'zouyuxuan122/Deepseek-Harness-EAC' explores similar frameworks: DeepSeek Harness Desktop (dsh-desktop). EAC: Embracing All Creation (揽尽万象). Bundled Node.js runtime with full dsh-CLI kernel, one-click startup...

Engagement Signals

0
Replies
open
Issue Status

Cross-Market Term Frequency

Quantifies the cross-market adoption of foundational terms like README.md and 非桌面宿主 by tracking occurrence frequency across active SaaS architectures and enterprise developer debates.